-
Full text
-
25
University of Bayreuth
African Studies
WORKING PAPERS
African Studies and the
Question of Diasporas
John Ayotunde (Tunde) Isola Bewaji
25
University of Bayreuth
African Studies
WORKING PAPERS
African Studies and
the Question of
Diasporas
John Ayotunde (Tunde) Isola Bewaji, 2021
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
ii
Institute of African Studies (IAS)
The University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers are published by the Institute of African
Studies (IAS), Bayreuth, Germany.
The IAS promotes and coordinates African Studies involving scholars from a wide range of academic
disciplines covering almost all faculties at the University of Bayreuth. The IAS acts as umbrella
organization and has three central units: the Iwalewahaus, the Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence,
and the Africa Research Center (Forschungszentrum Afrika, which is under construction). The IAS
coordinates research and teaching as well as the training of junior researchers, cooperates with
partners worldwide and facilitates the exchange of information between persons and institutions
engaged in research and teaching in or about Africa.
In the Working Papers series, we present empirical studies and theoretical reflections, put
preliminary findings up for discussion and report on ongoing projects and current research. The
Working Papers usually reflect work-in-progress; all contributions relate to African Studies in
general and Bayreuth African Studies in particular and invite discussion and feedback.
Submitted papers are subject to internal review at the University of Bayreuth.
Contributions can be submitted to the editor-in-chief Sabrina Maurus (sabrina.maurus@uni-
bayreuth.de)
The University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers feature on the EPub document server at
the university library:
2005 - 2018
https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/view/series/Bayreuth_African_Studies_Working_Papers.html
2018 - ongoing
https://epub.uni-
bayreuth.de/view/series/University_of_Bayreuth_African_Studies_Working_Papers.html
Institute of African Studies
Director: Prof. Dr. Cyrus Samimi
Vice Director: Prof. Dr. Eva Spies
University of Bayreuth
Wölfelstr. 2
D-95440 Bayreuth
Phone: +49 (0)921 554511
www.ias.uni-bayreuth.de
IAS@uni-bayreuth.de
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
iii
Africa Multiple connects
As the Working Paper Series of the Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence, Africa Multiple connects
offers a forum for research conducted and presented by researchers affiliated to the Cluster. The
series also accommodates papers such as invited lectures, workshop contributions, or conference
papers submitted by the Cluster’s guests and visiting scholars.
Established in January 2019 through the Excellence Strategy of the German Federal and State
Governments, and building on a long record in African Studies at the University of Bayreuth, the
Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence pursues an innovative agenda as expressed in its subtitle,
Reconfiguring African Studies. The Cluster hosts almost one hundred fifty scholars from three
continents, who represent a diverse range of academic disciplines and pursue joint research
interests together with partner institutions in Africa, Germany, Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Our
understanding of the reconfiguration of African Studies focuses on stimulating new theoretical
approaches and includes the creation of new forms of academic collaboration. The Cluster develops
and pursues research questions and theory-building in collaborative interdisciplinary projects, most
notably those conducted with our African Cluster Centres (ACCs) at the Universities of Lagos
(Nigeria), Joseph Ki-Zerbo (Burkina Faso), Moi (Kenya), and Rhodes (South Africa).
Our key concepts are multiplicity, relationality, and reflexivity. We employ them to capture the
dynamic interrelationship of diversity and entanglement that characterize African and African
diasporic ways of life and world-making. In the Knowledge Lab, we connect our theoretical,
epistemological, and methodological issues, spark intellectual exchange, and stimulate new
theoretical advances. Our Digital Research Environment integrates heterogeneous analogue and
digital data, both qualitative and quantitative, into a common digital research platform. Through the
Bayreuth Academy of Advanced African Studies, the Cluster runs an international fellowship scheme
for junior and senior researchers as well as artists. Research-oriented training of doctoral students
is offered through the Bayreuth International Graduate School of African Studies (BIGSAS).
Africa Multiple connects complements the existing Working Paper Sub-Series published under the
umbrella of the University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers: academy reflects, the series
featuring research by fellows and postdoc working groups of the Bayreuth Academy of Advanced
African Studies, which is now part of the Africa Multiple Cluster; and BIGSASworks!, the platform
for publishing research-related articles and edited collections by Junior Fellows of BIGSAS.
Managing editor of the series Africa Multiple connects is Dr. Doris Löhr (Doris.Loehr@uni-
bayreuth.de).
Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence
Spokesperson: Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Seesemann
Deputy Spokesperson: Prof. Dr. Ute Fendler
University of Bayreuth
Nürnberger Str. 38, ZAPF Haus 3
D-95440 Bayreuth
https://www.africamultiple.uni-bayreuth.de
africamultiple-international@uni-bayreuth.de
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
iv
Our Latest Africa Multiple connects Publications
Title
Author(s)
Year of
Publication
Version
African Studies and the Question of
Diasporas
John Ayotunde (Tunde)
Isola Bewaji
2021
25 (2)
Figuring Out How to Reconfigure
African Studies
Rüdiger Seesemann
2020
24 (1)
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
v
About the Author
John Ayotunde (Tunde) Isola Bewaji (PhD Philosophy, Certificate in Philosophy for Children, MA
Distance Education) is Professor of Philosophy, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus,
Kingston 7, Jamaica.
He is Member of CODESRIA College of PhD Mentors in Africa and Senior Research Associate,
University of Johannesburg, South Africa. He was Carnegie/CODESRIA Visiting Professor in
Philosophy to Department of Philosophy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; Jay Newman
Endowed Visiting Professor of Philosophy of Culture, Brooklyn College – CUNY, USA; Guggenheim
Research Fellow in Philosophy of Culture; Member, Global Summit of Bioethics; Chairman, National
Bioethics Committee of Jamaica (NBCJ-UNESCO); founding Editor, Caribbean Journal of Philosophy
(CJP); founding President, International Society for African Philosophy and Studies (ISAPS), USA.
His books include Beauty and Culture (2003), An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (2007),
Narratives of Struggle (2012), Ontologized Ethics (2013, co-edited with Elvis Imafidon), Black
Aesthetics (2013), Introduction to Philosophy and Logic (2014, co-edited with others), The Rule of
Law and Governance in Indigenous Yoruba Society (2016), The Humanities and the Dynamics of
African Culture in the 21st Century (2017, co-edited with others), Media Theory, Practice and Ethics
(2017, with P. B. Adedara) and Identity Recreation in Global African Encounters (2019, edited with
Doyin Aguoru). He is Fellow of the Jamaica Institute of Management (FJIM) and Member Nigerian
Academy of Letters (MNAL).
Acknowledgments
This working paper is the slightly revised version of “African Studies and the Question of Diasporas”
which I presented at the Conference “Africa Multiple: Conversations and Building Networks” at the
University of Bayreuth, from October 29-31, 2019. I want to acknowledge the generous funding of
the trip by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under
Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2052/1 – 390713894.
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
vi
Contents
Institute of African Studies
ii
Africa Multiple connects
iii
Our Latest Africa Multiple connects Publications
iv
About the Author and Acknowledgements
v
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
1
Introduction
1
2
Background
2
3
African Participation in Slave Trade
6
4
Middle Passages: Atlantic, Sahara Desert, Mediterranean, Red Sea and the Pacific
7
5
The Empty Baggage Syndrome and Epistemicide
8
6
The Willie Lynch Syndrome
10
7
Recommendations for Global African Studies and the Diaspora
12
8
References
14
African Studies and the
Question of Diasporas
John Ayotunde (Tunde) Isola Bewaji
1 Introduction
The concept “Diaspora”, applied to Africa, is a misnomer of sorts, bearing in mind that Africa was the
original home of the oldest known remains of human beings. Science has shown us how the earlier
waves of emigrant Africans (humans originally domiciled in Africa) have adapted to their
environment, becoming various shades as melanin presence dictated in response to the climatic
requirements for survival (Sample 2017; Smith et al. 2007; Stringer 2016). Later groups are in India,
Tonga, New Zealand, Australia, and the Americas: black skinned, flat nose, but with various forms of
stretchered out hair. These earlier groups are not called, technically, Diaspora. Only recent migrants
to the West, Europe, Asia Minor, Asia and the Americas are called Diaspora: they migrated
voluntarily for various reasons or they were forced out of Africa as captives.
Part of the challenges that African Studies instigate are fraught, because of (a) the participation of
continental Africans in slavery wars in Western, Eastern, Northern and Central Africa; (b) the
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
2
Middle Passages of the Atlantic and the Sahara/Pacific; (c) the empty baggage syndrome and
epistemicide and, (d) the Willie Lynch Syndrome of Divide and Conquer, exemplified in the
tokenistic Obama phenomenon. African studies writ large must then encompass (a) Repairing the
Breach; (b) Recovering the Heritage – Calypso, Blues and Jazz, Reggae, Rastafari, Sports; (c)
Restoring Indigenous Knowledge Systems by erasing epistemicide and (d) Restoring the African
humanity. These efforts must be multi/inter disciplinary and encompass all domains of human
intellectual theory and practice. Recovering the human intellectual traditions and knowledge
systems of continental Africans and the Diasporas would be a treasure trove of ideas to solve many
of the challenges faced by humanity today; this will require transcending what Claude Ake (1979)
has called Social Science as Imperialism and what Lewis R. Gordon (2006) called Disciplinary
Decadence. This is an urgent task in the face of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and
Threats posed by the “The Dragons” being here, there and everywhere. Beware, the Dragons!
Beware, the Dragons!
In this essay, I attempt to sketch what would constitute a more appropriate, historiographically
accurate and globally judicious understanding of African Studies that is holistic. My goal is to sketch
an African Studies that is not segmented on the basis of the agendas of exogenous forces bent on
decimating global African peoples, by playing diverse groups against each other, but one which
recognizes the continuity of human heritage as primarily African heritage writ large, and one which
recognizes that the African Diasporas, recent and classical, are all continuous with Africa feeding
and renewing the world with humanity by virtue of being the original home of humanity. This calls
for so many different approaches, but primary being the complete overhaul of the current curricula
used to programme the minds of humanity, especially those emanating from European climes, to
persist in negro-gaze: the objectification and exoticization of Africa and peoples of Africa globally,
thereby derogating their humanities and agencies.
2 Background
The name, word, concept, and/or idea that is “Africa” is fraught with liminal and subliminal
anxieties (Masolo 1994; Mudimbe 1988, 1994). This is because of the politics of race, civilization,
language, culture, religion, science, reason, technology, economics, development, arts and, indeed,
humanity. This politics determines who, what, where, when and how of the humanity of some/the
“other”; this is especially the case when this is related to allocation and appropriation/expropriation
of resources on the local (as in colonial Africa, the Bantustan homelands of South Africa and the
plantations of the Americas) and on the global scale (as in the skewed, warped and dissonant
situation enforced by Bretton Woods, International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and World
Trade Organization (WTO)) on “developing” countries, sans China. For this reason, many scholars
adopt the simplified but obscure concepts such as “black”, “Egypt”, “Nubia”, “Ethiopia”, “Moors” or
“Negroid” or even the ahistorical and racially inflected “Africa South of the Sahara”, to anticipate the
various strictures that attend the discourses surrounding how to annotate the existence and essence
of the humanity and contributions of the present day indigenous peoples of the continent of Africa
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
3
to global human heritage in all aspects of our collective existence. Those who refused to play the
game as designed by Eurocentric scholarship and have deigned it fit to integrate Africa within our
collective human history have been marginalized to the fringes of scholarship, and their efforts are
neither taught nor engaged, vide: Diop (1974, 1978, 1991), Davidson (1966, 1992), Obenga (1992,
2004), Karenga (1990, 2003, 2010), Asante (2004, 2006, 2009), Bernal (1987), Clarke (1991) and
Van Sertima (1976, 1991, 1992a, 1992b, 1993).
For the sake of avoiding the debilitating baggage the above issue could raise, as a plenary like this
has limited space to facilitate detailed explicative argumentation, I will simply speak of Africa in
continental terms – inclusive of all the historical hues and physiognomic features of the peoples
indigenous to the continent from Cape to Cairo. This enables me, without apologies, to capture the
fact that, essentially, wherever we find ourselves, as humans, domiciled in any and all parts of the
world in current times, either through voluntary or forced prehistoric, classical or contemporary
regional and intraregional migrations – immigrations, emigrations and transplantations – all
humanity are descended from this core continent, Africa. For this reason, one could safely say that
Africa and the Diaspora means all who reside in Africa now and all humans living in other parts of
the world. This will help us to unavoidably cement our common ancestry from the same pool of
humanity, thereby maintaining a common bond of humanity between all humans, even if some are
spiteful of and hate to acknowledge this inexorable historical fact and its implications. But helpful
and desirable as this would be, it would lose its theoretical and practical, intellectual and material
significance, because of the obfuscation that would attend such imprecision that arise in saying
Africa and Diaspora studies means continental Africa and global humanity studies.
There has been another popular tendency to think of Africa and its Diaspora as being only
concerned with continental (mainland) Africa and blacks in the Americas. This particular politically
skewed narrative is a function of a construction of African ontogenesis in the limited, narrow and
imaginatively hollow historiogenesis; it relates Africa’s nativity in the sense of a modernity
purloined through only the despicable holocaust of Atlantic slavery. The challenge of decoupling
Africa from this inhuman intellectual disfiguration is gargantuan and daunting. Not being a student
of history, archaeology, anthropology, paleoecology or linguistics means that I am probably the least
qualified to dabble into matters as recondite as these. However, my understanding of the history of
the intellectual heritage of humanity, the twists and the turns in the trajectories of civilizations, the
patterns and shifts in the centres of global power structures, the rise and fall of traditions of
dominance, all seem to show that narrowly crafted narratives for the purpose of reification of
particulars as universals and derogation of commonalities as inessentials impel my reading of
human ancestry in global terms. This is an African (specifically, the Yoruba) way: seeing human
beings as human beings, regardless of hue or shape or other limiting differences; thereby ensuring
the extension to these “strangers” in their midst the fellowship which allows them to feel welcome
and to retain their human dignity (Bewaji 2013, 2016).
Hence, when I say that the concept “Diaspora” applied to Africa is a misnomer of sorts, bearing in
mind that Africa was the original home of the oldest human beings, what this implies is the fact that
wherever humans live, we/they are all Africans. The confusion will be multiplied when African
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
4
“Diaspora” is understood in the narrow sense identified above. What it does will be to diminish,
eradicate or destroy the contributions of Africa to global humanity. It would prevent the
appreciation of what Van Sertima has traced in volumes detailing early Africans in Asia, Eurasia, the
Pacific, Europe and the Americas. It challenges the orthodoxy of seeing rationality, science,
technology, civilization, development and enlightenment flowing unidirectionally from North to
South, and acknowledges that the kernel of every achievement humanity has made has its genesis in
Africa. It asks humanity for humility, the kind lacking in how the descendants of Joseph, who were
saved from imminent perdition in the Arabian peninsula during the period of famine by Egypt,
turned around to accuse their benefactors of enslavement and fictionalizing the great Exodus in
their return to displace their brothers and sisters from their ancestral lands; doing this is long
overdue and the right thing: this is the task of African Studies and the Question of the Diasporas
which I urge all who toil in the vineyard of knowledge to take on.
In any case, the politics of race is a strange animal and it is deployed in ever stranger ways for
purposes that fit only the bestial ways of the powerful (arrogance and impunity of the power
drunk). In many instances it totally denies science and reason, while in some instances it embraces
science with one hand and negates science with the other hand. It accepts the place of Africa as the
initial home of humanity, but denies the place of Africa in global human heritage; this may be
because of self-shame brought about by the realization of the humbleness of one’s origins, and the
sacrifices our common ancestors have made to ensure our survival as viable individuals, groups and
nations. For strange political and economic reasons, it is like humble parents disowned by its/their
own children because they, the children, have suddenly fallen into strange, unearned or stolen
wealth, and the humble beginnings of their ancestry seems to be suddenly a shameful reminder of
our common ancestry and this is now somehow beneath/below their humility to showcase to the
whole world. Among the most revered of European thought is Hegel (1956), who denied the
capacity of Africans to reason or to be any part of history. Even the advocates of “Social Contract”
were not any better, as while pontificating on this theme, had interests in the enslavement of blacks
in the Americas as in the case of Locke’s Janus faced theory and practice, political writings and
investment choices which compromise the freedoms he so celebrated (Ashcraft 1986, 1987).
Since the sciences and technology have shown us how the earlier waves of emigrant Africans
(humans
originally
domiciled
in
Africa)
have
adapted
to
their
environments,
becoming/developing/evolving various shades as melanin and solar irradiation presence have
dictated, developing various physiognomic identities, protecting their nakedness through foliage of
hair and animal/plant materials, and encoding these into various protective cultural norms of filial
mechanisms and educational preservatives of racialized prejudices, we will not delay ourselves with
such earlier emigrants out of mother Africa (Sample 2017; Smith et al. 2007; Stringer 2016). But we
cannot but be concerned about the excision of the later, recent, and/but not so recent emigrant
groups who are in Southern Europe, India, Asia, Tonga, New Zealand, Australia, the Pacific and the
Americas from the direct rubric of African Diaspora: these are clearly dark/black/brown skinned,
flat/progressively narrowed nose Africans, of various complexion hues, but who are now adapted
with various forms/degrees of stretchered out hair. The earlier emigrant groups are not called
Diaspora because of distance in time of leaving/emigrating Africa; while the latter groups do not
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
5
consider themselves Africans because of the odium of being associated with victims of ignorance,
greed, avarice and the negative politics of race that would attend such self-identification – success
has numerous relatives, but poverty/destitution is usually orphaned loners.
Only recent emigrants/immigrants/forced/enslaved Africans in/to the West, Europe, Asia Minor,
Asia and the Americas are now called the African Diaspora: the idea is to say these are the only
African Diaspora, because they emigrated voluntarily for various reasons, or they were forced out of
Africa as captives (victims of Atlantic genocide) or as victims of enforced conflicts, natural disasters
or human trafficking.
For the purpose of this discussion, therefore, when we speak of African Studies and the Question of
Diasporas, we will be limiting our attention to African Studies and how these research/scholarship
areas have integrated or neglected global African Diaspora, dilating on the intersections between
the various disciplines in the global academy and the paucity of proper curriculum that faithfully
reflect human history. For the rest of this discussion, having demonstrated our complicity as
historians, philosophers and intellectuals in the derogation of Africa as a continent and her
inhabitants and in the process maligning global African Diaspora, I will attend to the following
issues which have been understudied, under-apprehended and poorly analysed for purposes of
knowledge distillation curriculum development, knowledge dissemination and global international
relations policy determination:
The participation of continental Africans in slavery wars in Western, Eastern, Central,
Southern and Northern Africa;
The Middle Passages of the Atlantic, Sahara Desert, the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the
Pacific;
The Empty Baggage Syndrome and Epistemicide and,
The Willie Lynch Syndrome of Divide and Conquer, exemplified in Obama tokenism
phenomenon.
In this regard, I will argue that going forward, Global African Studies, writ large, must proceed by
taking in hand the challenges and the opportunities attendant to a better understanding and
utilization of the wealth of ideas, experiences, knowledges and traditions which the dispersals of
Africa’s children across the globe have made our collective heritage, impressing on us that we must
proactively, through the deliberate investment in decolonized and deracialized Global African
Studies:
Undertake the huge and inevitable task of repairing the Breaches and mending the Cords;
Recovering the Heritages and Cultures – Religions, Metaphysics, Aesthetics, Calypso, Blues
and Jazz, Reggae, Rastafari, Sports;
Restoring Indigenous Knowledge Systems by erasing Epistemicide and Epistemic Deficit;
and
Restoring the dignity of Global African humanity, and
In the process, our global humanity.
I will briefly explain the road map that I envisage for undertaking these efforts and meeting the
challenges they pose very briefly, going forward.
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
6
3 African Participation in Slave Trade
Various forms of slavery have always been a blight on human conscience and history from time
immemorial. This phenomenon was not alien to any geographical zone of the world from antiquity.
Slavery in various cultures has also carried various degrees of brutality, depersonalization,
deidentification, deprivation of the liberties and, in extreme cases, the dehumanization of the
enslaved. But most societies that enslaved peoples of different ethnicities had serious challenges
where recognizing the humanity of the enslaved was concerned, and various myths were evinced to
back up the savagery that made the enslaved and the enslaver less than human. In the case of Africa,
there were internal and external forces at play. These forces meant the dislocation of the possibility
of a singularity of understanding of slavery from the consciousness of the peoples among whom
such phenomena were present.
It is not strange to note that there was no region/continent that had any name before modern times
associated with specific groups or people as ethnicities or languages before modern times. The
continent of what is now Africa was the land of the blacks: descriptively, Moors, Nubia, Ethiopia,
Aigiptus, etc.; all of these were descriptive of the dark complexion of the people living on the
continent (Bewaji 2013). Europeans, domiciled in the contemporary continent of Europe starting
from the British isle and ending in China constituted one contiguous continent (landmass), that is
broken into two (Europe and Asia) for political reasons: Asia is part of Europe and Europe is part of
Asia. In reality, there are only three continents in the world, plus the big islands – Japan, Australia,
New Zealand, Madagascar, Hispaniola, Cuba, Falklands, etc. People lived without need for politics of
naming; people who came across each other may have descriptive adjectives for those they met.
Over time, these adjectives stuck and became their names. The West Indies, where we live, as a
name for the Caribbean, is a product of ignorance - Columbus thought when he reached here, he was
in India. And as such when he found out that India was on the other side of the world, instead of
calling the people here the true name they called themselves, they named them West Indians,
because the white man is never wrong!
In any case, it was through the agency of African indigenous knowledge systems that Columbus
found his way to the Americas and back to Europe. Before Atlantic genocide perpetrated by Europe
on Africa through the slave trade, the population of West Africa was sizeable. West Africans had
visited, traded with and integrated their cultures with those of the Americans (Sertima 1976). They
also traded with Europe, had embassies in the courts of European kings and were recognized as
peers in all respects. Various African civilizations evolved various forms of political governance and
responded to various needs. And where differences existed, these were settled through various
conflict resolution mechanisms, the last resort being war. Most of the recorded large-scale battles in
Africa were linked to slave trade, before the partitioning of Africa and colonization. It was the end of
slave trade that brought about another form of slavery – colonialism; if you cannot trade in humans
across borders, then enslave them locally, calling them protected persons: British Protectorate, from
what, against what - the partition of Africa, definitely.
There is now a huge movement afoot justifiably for reparations. Examples of reparations abound in
human history: Amerindians, Maoris and the indigenous peoples of Australia and New Zealand,
Germany continued to pay reparations to the people and state of Israel for the Holocaust, etc. But
the resonance and necessity of/for reparations to Africa (especially West Africa) is often attenuated
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
7
by the existence of various forms of indigenous African ‘slavery’, before external (European)
enslavers exploited the human capital of Africa for the development of Europe in all ways. This is
then compounded by the argument that since Africans actively engaged in slavery at the indigenous
level and in the exportation of Africans to other climes, the complicity of Africa mitigated the just
demand for reparations.
There is something to be said for and against these arguments. But these are issues which future
research in African studies, especially with regards to the African Diasporas, must concentrate on.
We must study and understand the Metaphysics of Reparations; this is necessary in order for the
Epistemologies, Politics and Economics of Reparations to make sense to the targets and subjects of
Reparations. It is when such a studious recognition is made that we can truly begin the process of
asking the children of Africa, other ethnicities, hues and races of peoples, who have exploited Africa
mindlessly in the Arabia, Europe and the Americas, to make amends/ atonement/ restitution/
restoration for their greed, their inhuman cruelty to their ancestry and pay spiritual and material
reparations that will ultimately enable Africa and its Diasporas to feel a level of filial belonging to
the community of humanity.
Elsewhere I have argued that Africa must come clean (Bewaji 2012). Coming clean means
recognizing its role in the enslavement of Africans in various parts of the world: Atlantic, Sahara
Desert, Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, Asian and the Americas. Continental Africa must tender
unreserved apologies to Africa Diasporas globally for the various egregious activities which made
(and continue even now, to make) the enslavement, emasculation, degradation, impoverishment
and dehumanization of Africans possible on a global scale. African Studies in the new millennium
must proactively investigate the magnitude of African enslavement in all parts of the world, and the
culpability of individuals (including John Locke and David Cameron), groups and regional
participants in this reprehensible historical legacy of human infamy. There must be no stone left
unturned in the process of using all the intellectual, scientific, technological and spiritual resources
available to ensure that proper accounting and accountability are ensured to prosecute this
important project. The investment in this, especially by Africa, is investment in a fully empowered
and liberated Africa; this is a task that must be done, so that Africa and the Diaspora can say –
NEVER AGAIN.
4 Middle Passages: Atlantic, Sahara Desert, Mediterranean, Red Sea and
the Pacific
One of the inherently unrecognized tragedies of the slavery of Africa and Africans is the factor of
simply overlooking the disastrous experiences of being transported across those spaces of
unimaginable alienation. Consider yourself, for one minute, being an individual who has spent all
your life not seeing a body of water bigger than five feet across, now being transported in chains
across a body of water that is thousands of miles across and a depth that is unfathomable. Now add
to that the fact that the space within which you make the journey is so constricted that ordinary air
(oxygen) becomes a luxury and nature calls become clear events that make your existence
hazardous and demeaning in the extreme. If you survive such dehumanizing and perilous
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
8
experience, and land at the immediate or end location of your lifelong incarceration, you have lost
faith in humanity and all the attendant ideas of providence and divine/metaphysical guidance. You
would have lost faith in the humanity of your abductors, those who took away your humanity
during the journey and those who purportedly now “own” YOU and their surrogates who
superintend your dehumanization.
We have not researched enough the effects of the spiritual, physical, psychological, moral and
material destruction these passages have wrought on abducted and enslaved Africans. That we see
Africans of the Diaspora and consider their physical beauty and elegance as evidence of wholesome
existence masks the trauma that lurks behind the apparent tranquillity. This, in itself, may explain
why there is, in many instances, absolute or muted disdain between Continental Africa(ns) and
Diaspora(ns). While remittances constitute the second largest portion of Jamaican GDP, for example,
mainly because of the African retention of filial bond – okun omo iya – the same cannot be said
between Continental Africa and the Diasporas. Indians, Chinese, Japanese, Jews and other ethnicities
never let go of their filial connections that bond themselves to homeland in the way in which
Africans and the Diasporas have been separated. Where there appear blips of connectedness, it
often manifests in fortune seeking relationships of further exploitative expropriation; there are only
rare genuine efforts at ensuring wholesome and genuine mutual understanding and cooperation.
Africa needs its Diasporas, and the Diasporas need Africa. More importantly, humanity needs both –
there is too much at stake not to realize that the current system of social engineering founded on
greed, destruction and hatred (read Capitalism) is not working. The fountain of knowledges,
cultures, humanities and ideas, which emerged on the advent of human civilization, require that this
old but new vista which African indigenous knowledge systems constitute must be properly
harnessed for the future of humanity. We now have enough knowledge and technologies to make
virtually all parts of the world relatively habitable, such that the various middle passages are not
passages of horror and peril which desperate persons or criminals lure people to take any longer –
vide the caravans from Latin America to USA and attendant avoidable tragedies, the deaths in the
Sahara and the Mediterranean of migrants.
5 The Empty Baggage Syndrome and Epistemicide
Ivan Van Sertima (1976) wrote about the “empty baggage syndrome” as a foil for the denial of the
humanity of the Africans in the new world. All available evidence supports his thesis that the
Africans who were forced out of the continent to work as chattel in the Americas may indeed not
have been allowed to pack bags and baggage for the unplanned, unintended and unwanted
journeys; but, given their contributions to the development of the Americas through their works
and success of the plantation system in generating wealth for Europe’s development (industrial
revolution and modernity) it was obvious they were professionals, specialists and seasoned
administrators from their different home countries (Bewaji 2010). That this was the case was
evident in how they brought their knowledges of medicine, agriculture, science, technology, music,
religions, the arts, etc., to the new horrifying situations in which they found themselves. The erasure
of the intellectual heritage of African captives was only matched by the destruction of the
intellectual traditions of continental Africans (Bewaji 2012). These were affected in all ways
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
9
detrimental to continental Africa and the African Diasporas and beneficial only to Europe and
Arabia. In religion, Africans and their descendants were made to pray to alien morally bankrupt,
intellectually deficient, emotionally unstable, attention seeking, blood sucking, war mongering,
schizophrenic gods. In social engineering, Africans were forced to embrace pernicious
individualism, abandoning communal mutually supporting social networking traditions in a manner
that has been most disorienting and destructive. In trade, the best of Africa was taken from Africa
and the Diasporas (the enslaved Africans in the various parts of the world were never given just
recompense for their efforts anyway) and the wastes of Europe and Arabia (decadence and
impoverished ethical orientations) were returned.
What “empty baggage syndrome” did to the Africans of the Diaspora, “epistemicide” did on a larger
scale to continental Africa (Bewaji 2010, 2012). The infestation of the intellectual space of Africans
globally with epistemic deficit parades in all aspects of Africana being today to evince diffidence,
inferiority complex, moral dependence, unimaginable mendicancy, rank profligacy with resources
and the worst forms of identity crises ever faced by any ethnic group in the world. These are under
researched areas which new African/a Studies must address.
What is “epistemicide”? Epistemicide is the deliberate act, behaviour, exercise or crime, violent or
non-violent, overt or benign, of omission or commission, committed against a group or groups with
the sole or ultimate intent to destroy the existence of the group or groups; it is a coordinated plan of
different actions and inactions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of
national or racial groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves or making a nullity of
the identity, self-esteem, self-awareness or corporate existence as autonomous or separate being of
a group or groups. It is the deliberate, calculated, concerted and systematic destruction, in whole or
in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group identity or belief in such separate identity
and existence, through the negations of their knowledge systems, denial, expropriation of their
intellectual property and foisting on the intellect of the target society a mendicant and supplicant
genuflecting approach to existence (Bewaji 2012).
The destruction of the African agency was perfected by Europe and Arabia, through the extinction of
African capacity for knowledge generation, moral agency and leadership accountability. Africans,
who were the first set of humans to build civilizations, with both functional and purely symbolic
aspects, were not even allowed again to have a capacity to peruse the supernatural and come away
with an idea of divine existence of their own accord. They have to, now, embrace the two most blood
sucking deities of the Arabian Desert, whose competition for scarce resources know no moral
bounds.
The forces of destruction also managed to impose a fake form of governance which panders to greed
and division, called democracy on humanity, wiping out the need for consensus in the
determination of common interests, rather than assignment of spoils to winners and poverty to
losers; thereby creating members of the same families, communities, nations who are constantly at
war with each other in competition over who shall have access to the spoils of political warfare
called democratic governance. This is evident in how much capitalism invests in propagation of
deception of democracy as ordained governance system that benefits humanity. There is need to
study indigenous African governance systems which Europeans marvelled at when they foraged
into Yoruba land, for example, in the 18th Century.
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
10
6 The Willie Lynch Syndrome
Willie Lynch has often been described as a hoax, and the methodology of keeping in check and
controlling plantation the enslaved Africans, which he was reported to have advocated, was denied
to have ever happened. The idea is to suggest that it was all made up, and no slave owner ever
suggested this as a means of destabilizing the societies where the enslaved Africans could have
come together, even after plantation slavery was abolished, to pull themselves together for
progress. But no one denied that the uses of indigenous African languages were prohibited on
plantations, and separations of known kinsfolk took place. And no one denies that the use of African
drums was prohibited, so that there would be no surreptitious communication of information
between plantations – but Pan Music still evolved, using discarded drums of cargo left behind by
Europeans. And even more specifically, no one denied that moles were planted in African
organizations, like that of Marcus Mosiah Garvey and the destruction of his Black Star Company, to
spread dis/misinformation and to undermine his organization which was becoming a thorn in the
flesh of racist hegemons. In the case of Marcus Mosiah Garvey, his own impetuosity, financial
incompetence, probable arrogance and personal character flaws may have played a major role in his
final demise. Also, the case of Tulsa in Oklahoma, USA, where the Black Wall Street was razed to the
ground and American African Entrepreneurs and their families were systematically targeted, their
properties destroyed and wiped out in a case of contemporary racial genocide must not be
forgotten. And in Africa’s contemporary times, we must remember the fates of Patrice Lumumba
(Congo), Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana), Amílcar Cabral (Guinea Bissau and Cape Verde), Julius Nyerere
(Tanzania), Moshood Abiola (Nigeria) and others, who, comprehending the ways of the perfidious
West, wanted better for their people. From the highways to the byways, deliberate efforts were
made to undermine the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and the African Union (AU), using
various tools in the boxes of colonialism and neo-colonialism; of which French control of the
financial systems of its ex-colonies and levies on Haiti which has emasculated these countries
remain poignant. We could ask, even if the syndrome was never real, what about what has
transpired in continental Africa and the ways in which a Mobutu, a Tsvangirai, a Babangida, a
Savimbi or a Dudus is fabricated to derail progress at critical moments in the history of Africana
societies? How else can one explain the failure of Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS), Southern African Development Community (SADC), Organization of African Unity
(OAU)/African Union (AU) or Caribbean Community (CARICOM) to understand the necessity for
cooperation in the interest of progress?
Consider what happens in the African American society as a signal example of Willie Lynch
Syndrome. How tokens of blackness are utilized to ensure that there is no unity among Africans
seem a proof of the Willie Lynch syndrome, real or imagined. The situation of Haiti, mentioned
above, the first country in the Western Hemisphere to defeat the armies of the West at the hay day
of slavery, only to be destroyed by a pernicious French taxation, is not lost on humanity (our
humanity, that is), nor is the effect of French policy of continued neo/colonization of colonies
purportedly nominally independent, which even a European country (Germany) found anomalous,
and a French President said if there were no French Africa, there would be no France; they are
crying shame on human conscience. These are all related matters which continue to enforce the
policy of emigration of Africana youths to service the Western societies’ needs for cheap labour and
intellectual renewal. But our educators and scholars hardly connect the dots to see where these
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
11
brain and brawn drains, and how it is a function of the hegemonic disorientation of global Africa
resulting in inability to appreciate the collective survival imperatives of mutual collaboration.
The need for African Studies to focus on these matters cannot be diluted. It is the common interest
of humanity that is at stake. The situation of our collective survival, which Kofi Anan (1998)
indicated we need a political will to accomplish needs to be studied. For, Adiye ba l’okun, ara o ro
okun, ara o ro Adiye – the fowl has perched on the rope, the rope is uneasy, the fowl is restless. The
situation faced by Europe, USA and other countries of the developing world, in light of terrorism,
emigrations/migrations, crime and violence cannot be solved unless we collectively, as humans,
take a leaf from African ideas of society and sociation (Akiwowo 1983). We share a consanguinity
that cannot be denied, except at our collective peril.
First, Africa and the Diaspora must invest in re-apprehending and appreciating the social and
scientific engineering that made it possible for the Nile to be dammed, for the pyramids to be built
all over Africa and the Americas, for the mummification of the dead, and for the Tasili region to
retain the arts of the desert, while Zimbabwe retained evidence of chemistry over 100,000 years ago
(Bewaji 2003, 2013). The fake idea of race, ethnicity, religious division, pernicious patriarchy, and
greedy graft that takes from the poor to give to the rich, must be checkmated with scholarship that
is robust enough to persuade the renegades among human beings that it is through our collective
wealth and sharing that our collective humanity is enriched. We must collectively show to the world
that the Capitalism that impels the “Parable of Talents” (Matthew 25:14-30) is totally destructive of
our collective humanity, and does no one any good, as both the rich and the poor will live in a
symbiotic relationship of fear and hatred. Afterall, there can be no disputing the veracity of the
Yoruba proverb that, Olowo kan l’aarin Otosi mefa, Otosi di meje – a rich person among six
impoverished persons makes seven impoverished persons. This is demonstrated by the caravan of
migrants from Latin America to the USA, as regardless of the peril, people will move from poverty,
danger and insecurity to locales of plenitude. Incidentally, most of the problems in Latin America
and in Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere are fomented by America principally and by Europe
collaboratively. Hence, stopping the migrants from source is impossible, even at the pain of death or
incarceration on arrival at the “greener pastures” they think their destinations are. Whether Europe
or USA likes it or not, the demographic shift which their official policies of greed and dispossession
of the vulnerable peoples of the earth of their natural and human resources will lead to
demographic minorities of Caucasians in these societies with time. The 2020 USA Presidential
Elections is a telling demonstration of these, but the angst generated in the minds of racists is yet to
be fully appreciated: when the Willie Lynch Syndrome stops working, it is our hope that the ways of
the beasts – Trumpism – will be mellowed by voices of reason, to prevent a conflagration that will
destroy prosperous societies because of self-hatred.
The many failures of capitalism are obvious. The meaninglessness and bogusness of democracy are
manifest – both from its vaunted Greek origins, where it was the minority citizens of the polis that
ruled, to the concocted ruse of contemporary wastage in the forms of electioneering and
sloganeering that gulps billions that could have gone into lifting the masses of the left behind
peoples out of poverty; there seems no end to the travesty that it has always been. African Studies,
in concentrating on global Africa, must pay attention to its ancestry. African Studies writ large
cannot afford to be left out of the equation of where to take our collective humanity in the critical
century which may determine the survival of humanity or its perdition. Why is it that even as
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
12
notoriously violent as Jamaica is stereotyped to be, remittances constitute the second largest
income earner, after tourism? There must be something valuable in African civilization which the
Diaspora can teach humanity about the intrinsic worth of human life, and which our collective
humanity can research and use to raise humanity globally, beyond destructive complexes that are
fabricated with lives of their own in the form of the Pentagon industrial complex and the need to
wage wars, first in order to deplete the stock of existing destructive inventory of arsenals and
second in order to continue the false sense of power that tyrants impose on global humanity. Global
African Studies must ensure that the voices of wisdom enshrined in indigenous knowledge systems
are mined for the benefit of our collective humanity. This cannot be the case if direct responsibility
is not taken by Africana intellectuals in all the areas of the academy.
7 Recommendations for Global African Studies and the Diaspora
From the above reflections, there flows a number of recommendations for Global African Studies.
Recently an African Studies Association of Africa (ASAA) was formed. Similarly, an African
Philosophy Society (APS) was formed and its third biannual conference took place in October 28-30,
2019. The International Society for African Philosophy and Studies (ISAPS) was formed in 1994 and
in 2007, SAPINA (Society for African Philosophy in North America led by Dismas Masolo and Barry
Hallen) coalesced into it, to become a stronger international body. Similar organizations are
mushrooming globally. It is still a surprise that Society for Decolonial Educational Curriculum have
not yet been formed (probably I am poorly informed and it is my ignorance here), but this is a
necessary body, with robust philosophical underpinnings which will assist in the push to liberate
Africana educational systems and practices from the clutches of external interlopers dressed as
benefactors.
In essence, what our discussion has evinced is a demonstration of the salience of the need to have
robust African/a studies that is inclusive, inter- and multidisciplinary in conception and gestation,
intersectionalist in formulation, intergenerational in orientation and introspective in resources
generation and application, breaking those disciplinary decadences of artificial demarcations along
silos of insularities of the disciplines of the sciences, technologies, humanities, social sciences, etc.,
not networking and communicating with each other, as if the goal is not about our collective human
survival and flourishing. The effort which Africa Multiple Clusters implicate is an inclusive,
integrative and all-encompassing interrogation of the epistemes of indigenous knowledges, beyond
the tyrannies of imperialisms and hegemonies which currently ensure that the silos are
impermeable and impenetrable. Future knowledge generators must see the connections between
the various disciplines. Future knowledge users and disseminators must embrace what Code (1987)
described as epistemic responsibility, taking humanity back from Trumpism and alternative facts.
For this reason, the task which the Africa Multiple Clusters of the University of Bayreuth and its four
affiliate research and knowledge production partner centres and institutes in Africa must undertake
is to find creative ways of ensuring that young intellectuals and researchers across global Africa
take seriously the task of finding intellectually robust ways of, among others:
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
13
Repairing the Breaches and Connecting the Cords of filial relations among global Africa
which enslavement in the Americas and the Arabia, colonization and neo-colonization has
wrought asunder;
Recovering the Heritages and Cultures: Religions, Governance Systems, Calypso, Blues and
Jazz, Reggae, Rastafari, Sports;
Recovering, restoring Indigenous Knowledge Systems by erasing Epistemicide and
ameliorating Epistemic Deficit, and
Restoring African Humanity and our collective Humanity
If the above can be the only take-aways that we generate from this initiative, then we would have
begun the process of providing humanity with new vistas for future integration of our collective
survival in an inclusive way, rather than the current destructive winner takes all that is preached by
capitalism and “democracy” as practiced in the West.
By way of a concluding footnote, any scholarship, research or policy engineering effort conducted
about/on/in/with Africa must now actualize the vision of the Six Regions enshrined in the African
Union Charter: North, East, South, Central, West and Diaspora. The Africa Multiple Clusters must
include a Fifth Centre of Excellence – located in the Caribbean or Latin America (Brazil) – for the
effort to truly be about/on/in/with Africa. Ute Fendler is right on the money when she averred that
the future of African Studies must be cognizant of the shifts and intersections generated by changes
and changing patterns of relationality and reflexivity. She said:
Against this background, the three core terms "multiplicity", "relationality", and "reflexivity"
enable a more precise and deeper understanding of African and African-diasporic life-
worlds. You can therefore also expect new insights into the subject areas that you
mentioned in your question. What we envision is less a matter of directly application-
oriented research, but primarily of basic research that elaborates on the interdependencies
of cultural, linguistic, social, religious, political, economic, and ecological processes. This is
precisely how these processes can be better analysed and rendered understandable. In
individual cases, this can indeed lead to concrete solutions for practical problems (Fendler
n.d.).
This is what African Studies and the Question of Diasporas, as a component of the University of
Bayreuth Knowledge Lab means to me; it is the inclusive multiplicity, relationality and reflexivity of
the future trajectories for apprehending, curating, understanding, applying and validating Global
African Studies holistically and universally, for the benefit of humanity, through the restoration of
African humanity as an intrinsic centre for dignity, respect and agency.
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
14
8 References
Ake, Claude (2009). Social Science as Imperialism: The Theory of Political Development. Ibadan,
Ibadan University Press.
Akiwowo, Akinsola A. (1983). Ajobi and Ajogbe: Variations on the Theme of Sociation. Inaugural
Lecture Series 46. Ile-Ife, University of Ife Press.
Annan, Kofi (1998). “The Politics of Globalization”. Address Sponsored by The Harvard Academy for
International and Area Studies at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. Delivered on
September
17,
1998.
Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Accessed
at
https://academy.wcfia.harvard.edu/files/academy/files/kofi_annan_lecture_1998.pdf
Asante, Molefi K. & Karenga, Maulana (eds.) (2006). Handbook of Black Studies. Thousand Oaks,
SAGE Publishing.
Asante, Molefi K. & Mazama, Ama (eds.) (2004). Encyclopedia of Black Studies. Thousand Oaks, SAGE
Publishing.
Asante, Molefi K. & Mazama, Ama (eds.) (2009). Encyclopedia of African Religion. Thousand Oaks,
SAGE Publishing.
Asante, Molefi K. (2014). Facing South to Africa: Toward an Afrocentric Critical Orientation. Lanham/
London, Lexington Books.
Ashcraft, Richard (1986). Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton,
Princeton University Press.
Ashcraft, Richard (1987) Locke’s Two Treatise of Government. London: Routledge.
Bernal, Martin (1987). Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, Vol. 1: The
fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785-1985. New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press.
Bewaji, John A. (2003). Beauty and Culture: Perspectives in Black Aesthetics. Ibadan, Spectrum Books.
Bewaji, John A. (2012). Narratives of Struggle: The Philosophy and Politics of Development. Durham,
NC, Carolina Academic Press.
Bewaji, John A. (2013). Black Aesthetics – Beauty and Culture: An Introduction to African and African
Diaspora Philosophy of Art. Trenton, Africa World Press.
Bewaji, John A. (2016). The Rule of Law and Governance in Indigenous Yoruba Society: A Study in
African Philosophy of Law. Lanham, Lexington Books.
Bewaji, John A. et al. (eds.) (2017). The Humanities and the Dynamics of African Culture in the 21st
Century. NewcastleuponTyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
African Studies and the Question of Diasporas
15
Clarke, John H. (ed.) (1991). New Dimensions in African History: The London Lectures of Dr. Yosef Ben-
Jochannan and Dr. John Henrik Clarke. Trenton, Africa World Press.
Code, Lorraine. (1987). Epistemic Responsibility. Rode Island, Brown University Press.
Davidson, Basil (1966). Africa in History. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Davidson, Basil (1992). The Black Man’s Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State. New York,
Times Books/Random House.
Diop, Cheikh A. (1974). The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality. New York, Lawrence Hill
Books.
Diop, Cheikh A. (1989). The Cultural Unity of Black Africa: The Domains of Patriarchy and of
Matriarchy in Classical Antiquity. London, Karnak House.
Diop, Cheikh A. (1991). Civilization or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology. New York, Lawrence
Hill Books.
Fendler, Ute (n.d.). A New Chapter in Africa-related Research: Interview with the Two Chairpersons
of the New Cluster of Excellence for African Studies at the University of Bayreuth. University of
Bayreuth,
Excellence
Strategy,
Africa
Multiple.
Accessed
at
https://www.uni-
bayreuth.de/en/research/excellence-strategy/africa-multiple/interview/index.html. [last access
22.2.2021]
Gordon, Lewis R. (2006). Disciplinary Decadence: Living Thought in Trying Times. Paradigm
Publishers.
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1956). The Philosophy of History. Translated by John Sibree. Mineola, Dover
Publications.
Karenga, Maulana (1990). The Book of Coming Forth by Day: The Ethics of the Declarations of
Innocence. Los Angeles, University of Sankore Press.
Karenga, Maulana (2003). Maat, The Moral Ideal in Ancient Egypt: A Study in Classical African Ethics.
New York/London, Routledge Books.
Karenga, Maulana (2010). Introduction to Black Studies, 4th edition. Los Angeles, University of
Sankore Press.
Masolo, Dismas A. (1994). African Philosophy in Search of an Identity. Bloomington, Indiana
University Press.
Mudimbe, Valentin-Yves (1988). The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of
Knowledge. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Mudimbe, Valentin-Yves (1994) The Idea of Africa: African Systems of Thought. Bloomington, Indiana
University Press.
University of Bayreuth African Studies Working Papers 25
Africa Multiple connects 2
16
Obenga, Théophile (1992). Ancient Egypt and Black Africa: A Student's Handbook for the Study of
Ancient Egypt in Philosophy, Linguistics and Gender Relations. Saakana, Amon Saba (ed.). London,
Karnak House.
Obenga, Théophile (2004). African Philosophy, The Pharaonic Period: 2780-330 BC. San Francisco,
Per Ankh Books.
Sample, Ian (2017). Oldest Homo Sapiens Bones Ever Found Shake Foundations of the Human
Story. The Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
Smith, Tanya M. et al. (2007). Earliest Evidence of Modern Human Life History in North African
Early Homo Sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America. 104 (15): 6128-6133.
Stringer, Chris (2016). The Origin and Evolution of Homo sapiens. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371: 20150237.
Van Sertima, Ivan & Rashidi, Runoko (eds.) (1985). The African Presence in Early Asia. New
Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.
Van Sertima, Ivan (1976). They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America. New
York, Random House.
Van Sertima, Ivan (ed.) (1991). Blacks in Science: Ancient and Modern. Piscataway, Transaction
Publishers.
Van Sertima, Ivan (ed.) (1992a). African Presence in Early America. Piscataway, Transaction
Publishers.
Van Sertima, Ivan (ed.) (1992b). Great African Thinkers: Cheikh Anta Diop. Piscataway, Transaction
Publishers.
Van Sertima, Ivan (ed.) (1993a). African Presence in Early Europe. Piscataway, Transaction
Publishers.
Van Sertima, Ivan (ed.) (1993b). Egypt Revisited. Piscataway, Transaction Publishers.
John Ayotunde (Tunde) Isola Bewaji, 2021: African Studies and the Question of
Diasporas. Africa Multiple connects 2, University of Bayreuth African Studies Working
Papers 25 (Sabrina Maurus Ed.), Institut für Afrikastudien, Bayreuth.
